Two Ways to Centralizers of Equivalence Relations
نویسنده
چکیده
Recent works dealing with new considerations about the notion centralizer of equivalence relations gave the opportunity to reveal beyond this construction widerranging phenomenons of functorial nature which do not belong, as it is well-known, to this notion by itself. And this was done in two distinct ways: on the one hand through the notion of action accessible category [2] and on the other hand through the notion of fibrewise algebraically cartesian closed (facc) category [1] which deals with the existence of centralizers of subobjects in the fibres PtY E of the fibration points: ¶E : PtE → E. This two notions are both illustrated by the categories Gp of groups and R-Lie of Lie R-algebras. The aim of this talk is to elucidate what is their common core and to analyse how they are articulated in general.
منابع مشابه
FUZZY SUBGROUPS AND CERTAIN EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS
In this paper, we study an equivalence relation on the set of fuzzysubgroups of an arbitrary group G and give four equivalent conditions each ofwhich characterizes this relation. We demonstrate that with this equivalencerelation each equivalence class constitutes a lattice under the ordering of fuzzy setinclusion. Moreover, we study the behavior of these equivalence classes under theaction of a...
متن کاملTHE CONNECTION BETWEEN SOME EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS ON FUZZY SUBGROUPS
This paper, deals with some equivalence relations in fuzzy subgroups. Further the probability of commuting two fuzzy subgroups of some finite abelian groups is defined.
متن کاملOn certain semigroups of transformations that preserve double direction equivalence
Let TX be the full transformation semigroups on the set X. For an equivalence E on X, let TE(X) = {α ∈ TX : ∀(x, y) ∈ E ⇔ (xα, yα) ∈ E}It is known that TE(X) is a subsemigroup of TX. In this paper, we discussthe Green's *-relations, certain *-ideal and certain Rees quotient semigroup for TE(X).
متن کاملEquivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency.
Where do equivalence relations come from? One possible answer is that they arise directly from the reinforcement contingency. That is to say, a reinforcement contingency produces two types of outcome: (a) 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, or n-term units of analysis that are known, respectively, as operant reinforcement, simple discrimination, conditional discrimination, second-order conditional discrimination, ...
متن کاملON THE COMPATIBILITY OF A CRISP RELATION WITH A FUZZY EQUIVALENCE RELATION
In a recent paper, De Baets et al. have characterized the fuzzytolerance and fuzzy equivalence relations that a given strict order relation iscompatible with. In this paper, we generalize this characterization by consideringan arbitrary (crisp) relation instead of a strict order relation, while payingattention to the particular cases of a reflexive or irreflexive relation. The reasoninglargely ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Applied Categorical Structures
دوره 22 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014